<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Superscripting a registration mark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.position-relative.com/2007/11/easily-superscript-a-registration-mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.position-relative.com/2007/11/easily-superscript-a-registration-mark/</link>
	<description>web design/development &#124; my studio &#124; design resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:52:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: any</title>
		<link>http://www.position-relative.com/2007/11/easily-superscript-a-registration-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-1742</link>
		<dc:creator>any</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.position-relative.com/~relat1ve/?p=185#comment-1742</guid>
		<description>Wow, 2007. The placement is irrelevant despite what any client says. In written/type, it must simply trail the word or phrase in question without special formatting. Super/Sub/specific placement of a mark is only relevant in a graphical treatment. Often these become confused and a client will ask for &quot;placement&quot; of the mark with flowing/ typed text, which &quot;can&quot; be hacked into place, but is not legally required and therefore not enforceable except by the ignorant know-it-alls who think it is and write your checks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, 2007. The placement is irrelevant despite what any client says. In written/type, it must simply trail the word or phrase in question without special formatting. Super/Sub/specific placement of a mark is only relevant in a graphical treatment. Often these become confused and a client will ask for &#8220;placement&#8221; of the mark with flowing/ typed text, which &#8220;can&#8221; be hacked into place, but is not legally required and therefore not enforceable except by the ignorant know-it-alls who think it is and write your checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

